Summary Report and Recommendations
for
Cleveland Heights High School
Model School Planning Team


November 9, 1995
Prepared by
Mike Routa, Program Coordinator

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Send us your reactions


Introduction

The Center for Leadership in Education contracted with the Cleveland Heights High School Model School Planning Team to: Staff at the Center for Leadership in Education met with the Model School Planning Team and Restructuring sub-committee and consulted with a number of the committee members individually. Four questions provided the framework for all contacts:
  1. Where does the Model School Planning Team want to go?
  2. What will the Model School Planning do?
  3. How will the Model School Planning Team know it has arrived?
  4. What support and skills are needed to get there?
It is within the framework of these four questions that the remainder of this report is presented.

Where does the Model School Planning Team want to go?

It was clear from individual consultations and group facilitation that the Model School Planning Team wanted to begin restructuring efforts at the ninth grade level. The focus for the restructuring effort was to be on the following key criteria:

What will the Model School Planning Team do?

A number of programs and opportunities already exist at Cleveland Heights High School that meet the criteria listed above. The School of New Heights and Taylor Academy provide elements of the criteria to a select group of students. Numerous clubs, extra-curricular activities, and support systems are also in place.

However a systemic design that builds upon existing programs and unifies the goals in a planned and mindful manner is lacking. The Model School Planning Team may need to consider a plan that pulls together programs and ideas in a way that addresses the criteria. Based on our work with systemic school restructuring, the Center for Leadership in Education suggests the following:

Again, the design of the Academy plan is aimed at capitalizing on the key criteria and building upon elements that currently exist at School of New Heights and Taylor. Staff can be arranged in groupings of two to four subject areas. In many cases traditional core subject teachers will be matched with elective course subject staff to work with a group of students. In order to maintain opportunities for students to meet and mix with a diverse group, additional electives outside of the Academy should remain available for student selection.

Staff within each academy will need common planning time. Ideally, the planning time should differ from individual planning time. If finances prevent the additional time in the schedule, the staff may need to create an alternative paid meeting time to case manage student problems and academic growth.

How will the Model School Planning Team know it has arrived?

The Model School Planning Team can establish baseline data in each of the following areas: A staff, parent and community climate survey. ...

What support and skills are needed to get there?

The establishment of academies will require in-depth planning and staff development in each of the following areas: ...

Major Areas of Concern

  1. Throughout all meetings, participants seemed to equate school restructuring with a schedule change. While such a structure change may be one part of restructuring, it is only a small part. A more expansive and comprehensive definition of school restructuring must be embraced.
  2. School restructuring follows three phases which are:
      Capacity-building
      Innovation
      Incremental Improvement
    Based on discussion, the staff may need to focus on capacity-building before launching into an innovation stage.
  3. In the change process, 20% of the people are usually enthusiastic supporters of change, 20% are usually opposed and 60% are marginal. Before the staff institutes a major restructuring, they must arrive at consensus on how they will approach and respond to each group.
  4. Overall, staffs that have a large number of veteran teachers, i.e. with 23-30+ years, are less enthusiastic about restructuring.
  5. When restructuring begins in any organization, special interest groups from within and without often come out of the woodwork. In order to minimize their ability to sabotage, they need to be brought into the change process very early on.
  6. The high school principals and assistants are key people in providing support and removing obstacles that may be at the building, district or community level.
  7. The AFT should be invited into the restructuring process and be viewed as a full partner in restructuring.

Final Note

...